<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do You Know How I Got These Scars?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/08/do-you-know-how-i-got-these-scars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/08/do-you-know-how-i-got-these-scars/</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Stuart Sharpe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/08/do-you-know-how-i-got-these-scars/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 11:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=421#comment-218</guid>
		<description>_Why aren’t the Royal Shakespeare Company forced to put ratings on the majority of its plays?_

Technically the films aren&#039;t _forced_ to go through the certification procedure. The BBFC is an independent entity run by a board of film directors and such. Their classifications are not mandatory, cinemas and local authorities can provide different certificates if they wish, or ban films which the BBFC is approved. The BBFC system works because everybody agrees it is important. Plus, many stage plays are deemed unsuitable for children and the theaters disallow under 18&#039;s from entering - as with many concerts. Oh, and music with bad language and such carries a sticker, don&#039;t forget.

As for your experience watching a Disney movie while underage, I don&#039;t think that quite compares to, for example, an 8 year old watching films like _Pulp Fiction_, _Trainspotting_ or _Alien_. There are some images, concepts and situations that we rightly protect young children from. I think the cinema ratings system has its place.

Back on _The Dark Knight_, an &quot;interesting comment from BBFC&quot;:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7540292.stm was that _&quot;a 15 certificate would have denied an important part of the superhero&#039;s fan base the chance to see the film. Younger teenagers would not have been able to see it, and they are the very people who are going to love it.&quot;_

I think that supports my idea that the 12 certificate should be tightened up, but the 15 certificate being given a more &#039;advisory&#039; status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em>Why aren’t the Royal Shakespeare Company forced to put ratings on the majority of its plays?</em></p>

	<p>Technically the films aren&#8217;t <em>forced</em> to go through the certification procedure. The <span class="caps">BBFC</span> is an independent entity run by a board of film directors and such. Their classifications are not mandatory, cinemas and local authorities can provide different certificates if they wish, or ban films which the <span class="caps">BBFC</span> is approved. The <span class="caps">BBFC</span> system works because everybody agrees it is important. Plus, many stage plays are deemed unsuitable for children and the theaters disallow under 18&#8217;s from entering &#8211; as with many concerts. Oh, and music with bad language and such carries a sticker, don&#8217;t forget.</p>

	<p>As for your experience watching a Disney movie while underage, I don&#8217;t think that quite compares to, for example, an 8 year old watching films like <em>Pulp Fiction</em>, <em>Trainspotting</em> or <em>Alien</em>. There are some images, concepts and situations that we rightly protect young children from. I think the cinema ratings system has its place.</p>

	<p>Back on <em>The Dark Knight</em>, an <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7540292.stm">interesting comment from BBFC</a> was that <em>&#8220;a 15 certificate would have denied an important part of the superhero&#8217;s fan base the chance to see the film. Younger teenagers would not have been able to see it, and they are the very people who are going to love it.&#8221;</em></p>

	<p>I think that supports my idea that the 12 certificate should be tightened up, but the 15 certificate being given a more &#8216;advisory&#8217; status.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tizzy</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/08/do-you-know-how-i-got-these-scars/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Tizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 22:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=421#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Why aren&#039;t the Royal Shakespeare Company forced to put ratings on the majority of its plays? Is it because it&#039;s cultcher?

I snuck in with my friend to see Disney&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Blackbeard&#039;s Ghost&lt;/i&gt; though we were officially underage (a different rating system was in place at the time). Don&#039;t think it&#039;s done me any long lasting harm. The cinema staff certainly knew we were underage, as did my (quite strict) parents.

Now some book publishers have taken it upon themselves to advertise age guidance. Authors such as Jacqueline Wilson are refusing to take part, rightly so - it will die a death.

I checked out the BBFC comments on &lt;i&gt;Lolita&lt;/i&gt;, setting out reasons why it gave it an 18 go-ahead. http://www.bbfc.co.uk/news/press/19980320.html Included is this sentence:

&quot;Indeed the film-makers had played safe by using a 19-year-old body-double for all questionable scenes.&quot;

So that&#039;s all right, then; the actors were safe. Hmmm. Not sure that&#039;s what we want from you, BBFC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Why aren&#8217;t the Royal Shakespeare Company forced to put ratings on the majority of its plays? Is it because it&#8217;s cultcher?</p>

	<p>I snuck in with my friend to see Disney&#8217;s <i>Blackbeard&#8217;s Ghost</i> though we were officially underage (a different rating system was in place at the time). Don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s done me any long lasting harm. The cinema staff certainly knew we were underage, as did my (quite strict) parents.</p>

	<p>Now some book publishers have taken it upon themselves to advertise age guidance. Authors such as Jacqueline Wilson are refusing to take part, rightly so &#8211; it will die a death.</p>

	<p>I checked out the <span class="caps">BBFC</span> comments on <i>Lolita</i>, setting out reasons why it gave it an 18 go-ahead. <a href="http://www.bbfc.co.uk/news/press/19980320.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbfc.co.uk/news/press/19980320.html</a> Included is this sentence:</p>

	<p>&#8220;Indeed the film-makers had played safe by using a 19-year-old body-double for all questionable scenes.&#8221;</p>

	<p>So that&#8217;s all right, then; the actors were safe. Hmmm. Not sure that&#8217;s what we want from you, <span class="caps">BBFC</span>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
