<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Worst Scam On Earth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/11/the-worst-scam-on-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/11/the-worst-scam-on-earth/</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Stuart Sharpe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ladytizzy</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/11/the-worst-scam-on-earth/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>ladytizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=1297#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Oops, in my last comment I misrepresented myself (doh!) in the first para. It should read ...&lt;i&gt;I’ve never moaned that my family have not directly benefitted...&lt;/i&gt; the whole para is a complete mess since I obviously received schooling, oh, you get what I mean by now, surely.

Thanks for reply: no argument frome me, I wanted a rant (lack of nicotine)  :) Thing is, the pensions crisis has been known about for decades and only a pile of collapsed flans would have created so much public sector employment and give in, without a whimper, to the union demands for &lt;i&gt;their&lt;/i&gt; pensions, plus vote for their own wages.

Here&#039;s another typical gvt scam, spending MY money on this steaming heap:

http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/welfare-cats-cop/consultation.pdf

(also, substitute &#039;cats&#039; for &#039;dogs&#039; - similar doo-doo&#039;s)

The list below, is of the &#039;respected&#039; consultees who managed to scrape enough words to make a sentence:

&lt;em&gt;/* NOTE FROM STU: I have deleted this list of companies - just to explain why, I have noticed that this post has begun appearing on search engines when one searches for the name of some of the companies Tiz listed (&lt;a href=&quot;http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0geu.BnlklJLUQB2bNXNyoA?p=Top Hat and Tails Ltd Quarantine Kennels and Cattery&amp;fr=slv8-msgr&amp;ei=UTF-&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;example&lt;/a&gt;). Having business names appear in search results under the title &#039;The Worst Scam on Earth&#039; is not fair to the business owners or their employees. If you&#039;ve come here after searching for a kennel or cattery company&#039;s name, rest assured there is no implication that they are involved in any scams whatsoever! */&lt;/em&gt;

http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/welfare-cats-cop/consultlist.htm

Seriously, how much did that cost us to come up with &#039;Have cat. Give it food and water. If unsure see vet.&#039;

The End.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oops, in my last comment I misrepresented myself (doh!) in the first para. It should read &#8230;<i>I’ve never moaned that my family have not directly benefitted&#8230;</i> the whole para is a complete mess since I obviously received schooling, oh, you get what I mean by now, surely.</p>

	<p>Thanks for reply: no argument frome me, I wanted a rant (lack of nicotine)  <img src='http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Thing is, the pensions crisis has been known about for decades and only a pile of collapsed flans would have created so much public sector employment and give in, without a whimper, to the union demands for <i>their</i> pensions, plus vote for their own wages.</p>

	<p>Here&#8217;s another typical gvt scam, spending MY money on this steaming heap:</p>

	<p><a href="http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/welfare-cats-cop/consultation.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/welfare-cats-cop/consultation.pdf</a></p>

	<p>(also, substitute &#8216;cats&#8217; for &#8216;dogs&#8217; &#8211; similar doo-doo&#8217;s)</p>

	<p>The list below, is of the &#8216;respected&#8217; consultees who managed to scrape enough words to make a sentence:</p>

	<p><em>/* <span class="caps">NOTE</span> <span class="caps">FROM</span> STU: I have deleted this list of companies &#8211; just to explain why, I have noticed that this post has begun appearing on search engines when one searches for the name of some of the companies Tiz listed (<a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0geu.BnlklJLUQB2bNXNyoA?p=Top Hat and Tails Ltd Quarantine Kennels and Cattery&#038;fr=slv8-msgr&#038;ei=UTF-" rel="nofollow">example</a>). Having business names appear in search results under the title &#8216;The Worst Scam on Earth&#8217; is not fair to the business owners or their employees. If you&#8217;ve come here after searching for a kennel or cattery company&#8217;s name, rest assured there is no implication that they are involved in any scams whatsoever! */</em></p>

	<p><a href="http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/welfare-cats-cop/consultlist.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/welfare-cats-cop/consultlist.htm</a></p>

	<p>Seriously, how much did that cost us to come up with &#8216;Have cat. Give it food and water. If unsure see vet.&#8217;</p>

	<p>The End.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/11/the-worst-scam-on-earth/#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=1297#comment-528</guid>
		<description>That cycle works in principle, Tizzy - that you pay for me, and that I pay for the next generation. The problem here is not that, though. We all now have to pay for the _Government_ of the past 5 years and the next 5 years. It&#039;s the rampant increases in spending by the government that have put us in this position, not simply the day-to-day costs of keeping the population educated etc.

When you get upset about having to pay so many times over for public sector pensions, _that&#039;s_ the debt that I&#039;m referring to. And the debt caused by nationalising the banks, and the PFI timebomb.

As for why pick the 15-65 age range, that was the &quot;quickest statistic I had to hand&quot;:https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/uk.html. It&#039;s also useful in that that you can start working and paying off Darling&#039;s debt at 16, and you can start drawing a pension at 65. As for the &quot;married&#039;s&quot;, since we don&#039;t receive anything like the level of government support given to the &quot;unmarried&#039;s&quot; we have to pay proportionally _more_ than most other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That cycle works in principle, Tizzy &#8211; that you pay for me, and that I pay for the next generation. The problem here is not that, though. We all now have to pay for the <em>Government</em> of the past 5 years and the next 5 years. It&#8217;s the rampant increases in spending by the government that have put us in this position, not simply the day-to-day costs of keeping the population educated etc.</p>

	<p>When you get upset about having to pay so many times over for public sector pensions, <em>that&#8217;s</em> the debt that I&#8217;m referring to. And the debt caused by nationalising the banks, and the <span class="caps">PFI</span> timebomb.</p>

	<p>As for why pick the 15-65 age range, that was the <a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/uk.html">quickest statistic I had to hand</a>. It&#8217;s also useful in that that you can start working and paying off Darling&#8217;s debt at 16, and you can start drawing a pension at 65. As for the &#8220;married&#8217;s&#8221;, since we don&#8217;t receive anything like the level of government support given to the &#8220;unmarried&#8217;s&#8221; we have to pay proportionally <em>more</em> than most other people.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladytizzy</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/11/the-worst-scam-on-earth/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>ladytizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=1297#comment-524</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;One Trillion Pounds Sterling. Twenty Five Thousand Pounds for every single person aged between 15 and 65 years old in the entire United Kingdom.&lt;/i&gt;

But how much for the married&#039;s? And, more seriously, why that age range? Further, I don&#039;t have kids: I&#039;ve never moaned that my family directly benefits from the myriad family tax credits, schooling etc. I accept that I have been the recipient of past tax-payers.

I completely get where you&#039;re coming from, and I can&#039;t wait to vote these frackwits out. However, I&#039;d like to point out that I&#039;ve been paying for you for quite some time, whether you asked or not - that&#039;s how it works. And that&#039;s why I&#039;m particularly peed off paying twice, thrice, frice, to pay the platinum-plated pensions for public sector employees. 

In my time, womens pensions have been changed from being paid at age 60 to 65, the reduced rates for married women has been abolished, making me pay to catch up, but the NIC people have absolutely no idea what is going on.

It&#039;s a good thing the 11+ was around and enabled me to have a decent edu.

Arrrggghhh. Crap day - rant over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>One Trillion Pounds Sterling. Twenty Five Thousand Pounds for every single person aged between 15 and 65 years old in the entire United Kingdom.</i></p>

	<p>But how much for the married&#8217;s? And, more seriously, why that age range? Further, I don&#8217;t have kids: I&#8217;ve never moaned that my family directly benefits from the myriad family tax credits, schooling etc. I accept that I have been the recipient of past tax-payers.</p>

	<p>I completely get where you&#8217;re coming from, and I can&#8217;t wait to vote these frackwits out. However, I&#8217;d like to point out that I&#8217;ve been paying for you for quite some time, whether you asked or not &#8211; that&#8217;s how it works. And that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m particularly peed off paying twice, thrice, frice, to pay the platinum-plated pensions for public sector employees. </p>

	<p>In my time, womens pensions have been changed from being paid at age 60 to 65, the reduced rates for married women has been abolished, making me pay to catch up, but the <span class="caps">NIC</span> people have absolutely no idea what is going on.</p>

	<p>It&#8217;s a good thing the 11+ was around and enabled me to have a decent edu.</p>

	<p>Arrrggghhh. <acronym title="Crap">****</acronym> day &#8211; rant over.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/11/the-worst-scam-on-earth/#comment-523</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=1297#comment-523</guid>
		<description>Thanks patently!

I wish I could feel like things were about to change. Like the outcry over the PBR and now the arrest of a Shadow Minister could be channelled into really making a difference and getting our voices heard.

We can but hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks patently!</p>

	<p>I wish I could feel like things were about to change. Like the outcry over the <span class="caps">PBR</span> and now the arrest of a Shadow Minister could be channelled into really making a difference and getting our voices heard.</p>

	<p>We can but hope.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patently</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/11/the-worst-scam-on-earth/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>patently</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=1297#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Good summary.

You already know how at least &lt;a href=&quot;http://thepatentlyblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/angry.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I feel about it&lt;/a&gt;! :o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good summary.</p>

	<p>You already know how at least <a href="http://thepatentlyblog.blogspot.com/2008/11/angry.html" rel="nofollow">I feel about it</a>! <img src='http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
