<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Don&#8217;t Know What the Worst Thing About This Story Is</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/12/i-dont-know-what-the-worst-thing-about-this-story-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/12/i-dont-know-what-the-worst-thing-about-this-story-is/</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Stuart Sharpe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/12/i-dont-know-what-the-worst-thing-about-this-story-is/#comment-624</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=1461#comment-624</guid>
		<description>It shouldn&#039;t be wrong for oppositions to seek information from the government at any opportunity. Their job is to keep the government accountable and soliciting leaked information certainly falls under the definition - and I shall not be changing my mind with a change of government, either.

It _should_ be wrong (and I believe it _is_ wrong) for civil servants to engage in party politics. Therefore the person to blame in this case is the civil servant - if he was indeed acting for party political reasons (which I think is a safe assumption).

The thing that I dislike about the Damian Green case is that his arrest seems to have been for no reason other than intimidation. Arresting him was unnecessary and the only effect is to lessen the Opposition&#039;s ability to hold government to account.

As for lies, for all the laws Labour have brought it, it&#039;s shameful that MPs are still allowed to lie with impunity. That&#039;s a law worth making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It shouldn&#8217;t be wrong for oppositions to seek information from the government at any opportunity. Their job is to keep the government accountable and soliciting leaked information certainly falls under the definition &#8211; and I shall not be changing my mind with a change of government, either.</p>

	<p>It <em>should</em> be wrong (and I believe it <em>is</em> wrong) for civil servants to engage in party politics. Therefore the person to blame in this case is the civil servant &#8211; if he was indeed acting for party political reasons (which I think is a safe assumption).</p>

	<p>The thing that I dislike about the Damian Green case is that his arrest seems to have been for no reason other than intimidation. Arresting him was unnecessary and the only effect is to lessen the Opposition&#8217;s ability to hold government to account.</p>

	<p>As for lies, for all the laws Labour have brought it, it&#8217;s shameful that MPs are still allowed to lie with impunity. That&#8217;s a law worth making.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladytizzy</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/12/i-dont-know-what-the-worst-thing-about-this-story-is/#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>ladytizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=1461#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Today, I had an interesting debate/row with my husband regarding the implied right of civil servants to pass on info to Damian Green.

Brief precis: his assertion was that the gvt opposition were implying that civil servants have enjoyed a long enshrined right to pass on info to MPs who are not part of the gvt. Why should this be since a similar scenario in the commercial world could be considered commercial espionage?

Cutting to the chase, I asked if he believed that all journos should be arrested when they &#039;responsibly&#039; publish secret gvt info. No. Bottom line, we agreed that the main problem was that nobody trusted what this gvt says, ditto previous and future ones.

Again, going further down the food chain to local councils, the distrust is manifest.

Deny the right to form political parties? Dictatorship or anarchy? Bags I be leader of the Anarchists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Today, I had an interesting debate/row with my husband regarding the implied right of civil servants to pass on info to Damian Green.</p>

	<p>Brief precis: his assertion was that the gvt opposition were implying that civil servants have enjoyed a long enshrined right to pass on info to MPs who are not part of the gvt. Why should this be since a similar scenario in the commercial world could be considered commercial espionage?</p>

	<p>Cutting to the chase, I asked if he believed that all journos should be arrested when they &#8216;responsibly&#8217; publish secret gvt info. No. Bottom line, we agreed that the main problem was that nobody trusted what this gvt says, ditto previous and future ones.</p>

	<p>Again, going further down the food chain to local councils, the distrust is manifest.</p>

	<p>Deny the right to form political parties? Dictatorship or anarchy? Bags I be leader of the Anarchists.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
