<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Policies and Open Source Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/12/open-policies-and-open-source-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/12/open-policies-and-open-source-politics/</link>
	<description>The Weblog of Stuart Sharpe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 00:29:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ladytizzy</title>
		<link>http://archive.sharpesopinion.co.uk/2008/12/open-policies-and-open-source-politics/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>ladytizzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 15:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stuartsharpe.co.uk/?p=1856#comment-870</guid>
		<description>Charlotte Gore demonstrates a touching optimism on people&#039;s motivations. I&#039;ve no idea how many members her party has currently but I reckon it wouldn&#039;t take a lot of effort to get Jeremy Clarkson nominated as their leader.

The key words are &lt;i&gt;&quot;Done right...&quot;&lt;/i&gt; and she offers no help in that direction. Is there anyone out there who continues to believe a manifesto pledge lasts longer than candyfloss?

We both agree that Webcameron could/should have continued, after a bit of tweaking, and (people) investment. But if no-one was listening, was it better to pull the plug, or let it carry on?  We saw the real attitude of parliamentarians towards &#039;listening to the people&#039;, and those who would use such a site for their own benefit. Currently, at least one MP is far more interested in understanding why so many people voted for Eggnog/Owen/Eoghan...http://tomcharris.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/x-factor-final-liveish-thread/

However hopeless a constituency seat may be to win for whatever party you support, always vote. Parties get real taxpayers money for every 100 votes they get. Perhaps Charlotte &lt;i&gt;et al&lt;/i&gt; should be drumming that home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Charlotte Gore demonstrates a touching optimism on people&#8217;s motivations. I&#8217;ve no idea how many members her party has currently but I reckon it wouldn&#8217;t take a lot of effort to get Jeremy Clarkson nominated as their leader.</p>

	<p>The key words are <i>&#8220;Done right&#8230;&#8221;</i> and she offers no help in that direction. Is there anyone out there who continues to believe a manifesto pledge lasts longer than candyfloss?</p>

	<p>We both agree that Webcameron could/should have continued, after a bit of tweaking, and (people) investment. But if no-one was listening, was it better to pull the plug, or let it carry on?  We saw the real attitude of parliamentarians towards &#8216;listening to the people&#8217;, and those who would use such a site for their own benefit. Currently, at least one MP is far more interested in understanding why so many people voted for Eggnog/Owen/Eoghan&#8230;http://tomcharris.wordpress.com/2008/12/13/x-factor-final-liveish-thread/</p>

	<p>However hopeless a constituency seat may be to win for whatever party you support, always vote. Parties get real taxpayers money for every 100 votes they get. Perhaps Charlotte <i>et al</i> should be drumming that home.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
