Sharpe's Opinion

Monday, 5th Oct, 2009

Comments

Level-headed stuff, Mr S. The proverbial rock and hard place, then.

Personally, I can’t see the “absurdity” in holding a referendum on a treaty that was ratified by this Labour government illegitimately (ie: without a referendum), but I do take that as being one way of looking at it – and understand that that is Cameron’s way of looking at it.

As a consequence of this debacle – which, I appreciate, was not of Cameron’s making – no one should defect to UKIP which, as far as I am concerned, is not a serious political movement. It’s a fairly popular single issue pressure group that’s managed to do what most fairly popular single issue pressure groups manage to do and win a few European seats (like the Greens have – and the Bee ‘n Pee).

But no one should punish the Tories, by voting for the Kippers, for this travesty of European policy and betrayal of the British body politic and population by this Labour government. The guilt for that betrayal lies squarely at their door. And that should never be forgotten! Especially by anyone who wants to see them kicked out of power.

A vote for UKIP might as well be a vote for Labour.

 

“a significant proportion of the Tory membership will defect to UKIP.”

Errr, I think you’ll find this has already happened, judging by the vote percentages at the last Euro election!

 

I can’t stand the shrieking on either side of this debate. In simple terms once the treaty is ratified there is no point in a referendum because the only way the treaty can be unratified is for the UK to withdraw completely from the EU.

I happen to think that would be desirable and would campaign vigorously for such an outcome, but any referendum on that issue would have to be on that issue and no other.

There simply is not an option marked “go back to the previous treaty” once Lisbon is in force.

 

I don’t really think a full withdrawl would be best, but I know exactly where you’re coming from, BE. A referendum after ratification would Be a pointless waste of time and money, and that time would be far better spent working on getting the most out of the next treaty – which, if memory serves, won’t require a ratification process.

Still, there are a few post ratifaction concessions Cameron could win, if the Tories hold together long enough for him to win power. That’s a big if, though.

 

I started to write a comment, but it ended up as a blog post.

As I see it, if the treaty comes into force before we can vote on it then of the previous range of options, i.e. – accept the Treaty – refuse to ratify and require a renegotiation – leave the EU
we have only lost one. There are still two left. He’ll still need a referendum, though, to allow him to shut up the section of the public that disagrees with his decision.